JPMorgan Sued Over Cost of Generic Drugs in Health Plan

Ironwood Retirement Plan Consultants • March 24, 2025

The defendants claim the company breached its ERISA fiduciary duty by putting business interests ahead of the plan and its participants.

Current and former participants in the JPMorganChase health insurance plan for employees have sued JPMorgan Chase & Co. and JPMorgan Chase Bank and company executives and committees, alleging breaches of fiduciary duties under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act for how they allege the company mismanaged its prescription drug benefit under its health insurance offering.


The case, Seth Stern et al. v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al., was filed Thursday in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The plaintiffs are Seth Stern, Angela Bindner and Marianne Schmitt. Defendants include the company, the bank, its U.S. benefits executive, the company board’s compensation and management development committee, and Bernadette J. Branosky, Stephen B. Burke, Linda B. Bammann, Todd Combs and Virginia Rometty, all members of the board of directors.


JPMorgan could not be reached Friday for comment.


The complaint claims the defendants breached their fiduciary duties by “agreeing to grossly inflated prescription drug prices, costing the JPMorgan Plan and its participants/beneficiaries millions of dollars through higher payments for prescription drugs, higher premiums, higher out-of-pocket costs, higher costs, higher deductibles, higher coinsurance, higher copays and suppressed wages.”


The plaintiffs’ filing states that the defendants’ mismanagement led to the plan paying its pharmacy benefits manager—CVS Caremark, which is not a defendant in the case—too much for many generic drugs, which the complaint claims are widely available for less. In particular, the suit cites as an example the $6,229 price the plan’s participants paid for a 30-unit supply of the drug teriflunomide (the generic version of the drug Aubagio). The plaintiffs’ complaint states that the same supply of the same drug is available, without insurance, at retail and online pharmacies for prices between $32.96 and $11.05.


“No prudent fiduciary would agree or allow for its plan and participants/beneficiaries [to] pay a price that is more than two hundred times higher than the price available” at retail, the complaint states. The filing adds that the price disparities continue across all 366 generic drugs across the plan’s formulary.

The case was filed after the Federal Trade Commission, in January, issued a second report in as many years, finding that the three big U.S. PBMs have marked up drug prices.

The FTC issued its first interim report in July 2024 and, a few months later, filed an administrative lawsuit against the “big three” PBMs—Caremark Rx, Express Scripts and Optum Rx—and their affiliated group purchasing organizations.


Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021, plan sponsors are required to attest that the fees they pay for health care plans are fair and reasonable. As a result, it is important that plan sponsors apply a fiduciary process when evaluating their health plans, including pharmacy benefit managers, as well as remain aware of any pending litigation involving the providers.


The ERISA Industry Committee called on Congress last September to deem PBMs as fiduciaries under ERISA, as they play a significant role in negotiating prescription drug costs for plan sponsors managing health plans. Congress has not yet taken any action on the issue.


The suit against JPMorgan states that the company pays CVS Caremark about $3 million annually in administrative fees, in addition to the fees that Caremark collects for prescriptions.


The plaintiffs are seeking “appropriate” damages, to have the suit deemed a class action, and to have the defendants make the plan whole for all losses resulting from the claimed fiduciary breaches. They have also asked that an independent fiduciary be appointed to run the plan and that the PBM be replaced.

The plaintiffs are represented by the New York-based law firm Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll and Washington, D.C.-based Fairmark Partners.


Original source: https://www.plansponsor.com/jpmorgan-sued-over-cost-of-generic-drugs-in-health-plan/

Reported by:

By Ironwood Retirement Plan Consultants June 2, 2025
Managed Accounts Offer a More Personalized Approach
By Ironwood Retirement Plan Consultants June 2, 2025
Morgan Stanley retirement study findings released today show some employees tightening their belts; looking for more retirement planning assistance from employers
By Ironwood Retirement Plan Consultants May 29, 2025
Target-date funds have long played a vital role in giving American workers access to professional help when establishing and maintaining a diversified investment portfolio. However, the glide paths — the balance of stocks, bonds, and cash — that serve as the foundation for these platforms has traditionally been based on a single consideration: the participant’s projected date of retirement. To be fair, target-date funds have played an important role in helping millions of novice (and even expert, but busy) retirement plan savers invest in broadly diversified portfolios overseen and rebalanced on a regular basis by professional investment managers. But the allocation of those investments between investment classes — the glide path — is still often based on that one demographic factor. Still, it’s no more precise than a broad five- or 10-year time frame that approximates a traditional retirement age — which may, or may not, apply. That means, of course, that those investment allocations can be oblivious to key demographic considerations like gender (women tend to live longer), marital status (ditto married individuals), race, and health, as well as investment risk appetite and other means of retirement income support. In short, they can overlook the kind of things that would be considered if there were an opportunity to sit down in a one-on-one conversation with a financial advisor. Enter managed accounts — a solution that considers an expanded array of personal considerations like those noted above. These accounts craft a more relevant, personalized portfolio based on individual variables that can have a huge impact on how a retirement investment portfolio is designed. Traditionally, this was done via a one-on-one interview with an individual. But these days much of this data can be found in payroll systems and/or may already be maintained in recordkeeping platforms — or fields present in standard wealth management programs. The Potential Impact A Morningstar study found that after using managed accounts, 72% of participants who were off-track in saving for retirement increased their savings rates. At median, this represents a 33% jump from what they were contributing previously, or about 2% of their salaries on average. Additionally, a larger number of off-track participants (12%) started contributing enough to receive the full employer match. The study also found that after using managed accounts, participants’ assets were placed into portfolios that were more risk-appropriate. Moreover, the researchers noted “improved expected annual returns both in nominal and risk-adjusted terms.” The Bottom Line Managed accounts can provide retirement savers with a more personalized asset allocation — but not every managed account platform provides the same depth and level of customization. Additionally, that level of personalization comes at a price. Plan fiduciaries should carefully consider the cost, quality, and composition of those designs. They should also document how and why services were evaluated, selected, deemed necessary — as well as compensated — when adding a managed account option to their lineup. Sources: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/25/well/longevity-women-versus-men.html https://fortune.com/2023/01/13/why-are-married-men-healthier-on-average-women-gender-research/ https://www.morningstar.com/lp/impact-of-managed-accounts-2022update
By Ironwood Retirement Plan Consultants May 29, 2025
Threats of financial penalties and legal liabilities heighten the need for proper compliance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). Let’s go over the basics of what it means to be a fiduciary in an organization’s retirement plan. What is a Fiduciary? In basic terms, a fiduciary is a person or group in a company that is responsible for the retirement plan and does what is best for the participants in the plan. There can be three different kinds of fiduciaries in a plan: Named Fiduciary: This person or group is named specifically in the plan rulebook. There can be multiple people to handle different tasks such as investments and reporting. Appointed Fiduciary: A named fiduciary is allowed to assign fiduciary responsibilities to another person such as an investment manager to handle monetary decisions. Functional Fiduciary: This is someone that isn’t appointed as a fiduciary on paper, but steps into the role. Even if they aren’t officially listed on the plan rulebook, they legally become a fiduciary. Fiduciary Obligations According to ERISA, there are 4 main duties of a fiduciary: Acting in the best interest of the retirement plan participants, not the fiduciary’s or company’s. Making careful and knowledgeable decisions involving retirement plans. Don’t put your eggs in one basket. Spread out investments to reduce risks. Follow the plan rulebook unless it goes against federal guidelines. In addition to these main duties, there are additional tasks assigned to plan fiduciaries. Reporting, keeping records, and handling claims are large responsibilities that can result in major penalties if not completed correctly. To begin, fiduciaries need to annually file a Form 5500 with the government to be transparent with plan performance. Failing to do this can include up to $2,670 per day from the Department of Labor as well as IRS penalties. Keeping records related to the plan as well as sharing these records with participants will be important for any potential legal disputes that arise. Any claims made by participants about their retirement plans must also be handled by the plan fiduciary. Plan fiduciaries carry a big responsibility, and it’s important to operate fairly for the sake of the plan participants as well as know the regulations to mitigate any future liability issues. Source: https://www.plansponsor.com/fiduciary-basics-for-new-plan-sponsors/
By Ironwood Retirement Plan Consultants May 15, 2025
Day-to-day financial stress tops employee concerns, but most employers still focus on long-term retirement planning.
By Ironwood Retirement Plan Consultants May 5, 2025
We understand that most retirement savers aren’t financial experts, and that can make preparing for retirement feel overwhelming. The good news is that achieving a successful retirement doesn’t have to be complicated. By following a few basic steps, you could set yourself up for long-term financial security. Start Saving Now and Learn the Basics of Saving and Investing The earlier you begin saving, the better your chances of reaching your retirement goals. It’s also important to understand the foundational concepts of saving and investing. Familiarize yourself with the different types of investment products, such as stocks, bonds, and money market accounts. Each comes with its own set of risks and potential rewards, and knowing how they work—and how they fit into your overall portfolio—can help you make informed decisions. Take time to understand the details of your retirement plan and the benefits it offers so you can make the most of it. Avoid Common Mistakes Many retirement savers fall into the same traps: failing to diversify their investments, neglecting to rebalance their portfolios, making emotionally driven decisions, or not having a clear investment strategy at all. One of the best ways to avoid these mistakes is by focusing on that last item—developing an investment plan. Having a well-thought-out approach to investing can help you stay disciplined and better positioned for long-term success. Focus on Three Critical Components of an Investment Plan While you can’t control the ups and downs of the market, there are three key factors you can control: when you start saving, how much you save, and when you plan to retire. Starting early and contributing consistently often has a bigger impact on your retirement outcome than investment returns alone. Choosing when to retire is also critical. Delaying retirement, even by a few years, can give your investments more time to grow and provide greater financial stability. Monitor the Plan and Adjust as Necessary A strong retirement plan isn’t static—it should evolve with you. Major life events such as a new job, a growing family, changes in income, or unexpected financial challenges should all prompt a review of your retirement strategy. Regular check-ins can ensure your plan remains aligned with your goals and helps keep you on track for the future you envision. Looking for more information? Contact the IRPC Team at info@irpcsp.com to learn more about our fiduciary support, plan design consulting, participant education resources, or anything else you need to strengthen your retirement plan.
By Ironwood Retirement Plan Consultants May 5, 2025
Plan sponsors, stay ahead of the curve! This issue covers key trends like early retirement, hardship withdrawals, and market volatility. Get practical tips to boost employee financial security, improve plan design, and enhance participant engagement.
By Ironwood Retirement Plan Consultants April 29, 2025
EBRI research found that most Americans are confident about retiring, but 79% of retirees and 71% of workers expressed concern about changes to Social Security.
By Ironwood Retirement Plan Consultants April 8, 2025
In times of volatility, timing the market may seem tempting. But doing so could cost you.
By Ironwood Retirement Plan Consultants April 7, 2025
Did you know there's a tax credit designed to reward you for saving for retirement?
More Posts